Erin Gretzinger:
Under state open records laws, the Cap Times obtained the open-ended survey responses, which reveal the extent of tension in the community over what should be the school district’s priorities as it redraws school boundaries.
While dozens stressed the importance of diverse schools and equitably distributing resources, many also urged the school district to prioritize short commutes and avoid breaking up neighborhoods into different schools.
But demographically, parts of Madison remain sharply divided along racial and socioeconomic lines, meaning the preference for neighborhood schools could clash with desires to prioritize student diversity.
“Be mindful of race so that new boundaries do not create more segregated schools,” one person wrote. “It would be great if Madison neighborhoods were not so segregated, but they are.”
“Allow students to attend the school that they live closest to; do not bus students across the city for diversity’s sake,” another wrote.
Names of the survey respondents were not provided by the school district, which cited privacy concerns.
The responses aren’t comprehensive and don’t proportionally represent Madison schools’ student population. For example, about 78% of respondents identified as white, while 39% of Madison’s students are white.
Still, the hundreds of survey responses reflect what MGT’s consultants said are common frictions in school boundary reviews, providing a glimpse into the competing questions Madison school officials must weigh as they prepare to bring the first scenarios for new maps to the community in May.
…..
District leaders are also using the review to evaluate special programs and school options as part of a larger effort to attract families amid unexpected enrollment drops and increasing open enrollment rates out of the district.
The last boundary and attendance area review in the Madison school district was in the early 2000s. The district didn’t work with an external consultant and the School Board at the time ultimately made few changes, Green said
———
Madison enrollment notes.
Where Have All The Students Gone? 1995-2024
Curiously, Madison recently expanded its least diverse schools (Van Hise/Hamilton)…..
——-
Fast Lane Literacy
1998! Money and school performance.
A.B.T.: “Ain’t been taught.”
8,897 (!) Madison 4k to 3rd grade students scored lower than 75% of the students in the national comparison group during the 2024-2025 school year.
Madison taxpayers have long supported far above average (now > $26,000 per student) K-12 tax & spending practices. This, despite long term, disastrous reading results.
Madison Schools: More $, No Accountability
The taxpayer funded Madison School District long used Reading Recovery…
The data clearly indicate that being able to read is not a requirement for graduation at (Madison) East, especially if you are black or Hispanic”
My Question to Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers on Teacher Mulligans and our Disastrous Reading Results
2017: West High Reading Interventionist Teacher’s Remarks to the School Board on Madison’s Disastrous Reading Results
Madison’s taxpayer supported K-12 school district, despite spending far more than most, has long tolerated disastrous reading results.
“An emphasis on adult employment”
Wisconsin Public Policy Forum Madison School District Report[PDF]
WEAC: $1.57 million for Four Wisconsin Senators
Friday Afternoon Veto: Governor Evers Rejects AB446/SB454; an effort to address our long term, disastrous reading results
Booked, but can’t read (Madison): functional literacy, National citizenship and the new face of Dred Scott in the age of mass incarceration.
When A Stands for Average: Students at the UW-Madison School of Education Receive Sky-High Grades. How Smart is That?
Legislative Letter to Jill Underly on Wisconsin Literacy