K-12 Tax & Spending Climate: The special interest smorgasbord inside Illinois lawmakers’ 800-page-plus green energy behemoth – Wirepoints

Ted Dabrowski and John Klingner:

Champions of a deal, including Gov. J.B. Pritzker, are stuck balancing the competing demands of the labor unions, environmentalists, the equity movement and big business – all while cramming an enormous change down on Illinois’ energy sector and the general public.

Those competing interests are the reason why the package stalled. Primarily, there’s the jobs vs. climate issue that labor and environmentalists are clashing over.

But there are other sticking points, as well. Exelon wants subsidies to keep its Illinois nuclear plants running. Climate activists want subsidies of their own for renewable energy sources, electric cars, and more. Not to mention the struggle over who controls the money that will flow to new programs, commissions, task forces and infrastructure projects.

Perhaps what best defines what this bill is, and what it is not, are the comments by State Rep. Ann Williams: “We need to pass a climate bill, not a utility bill…Without climate, and without equity, we have no deal.”

“Energy” package delay unsurprising

The senate’s failure to pass the energy package after months of negotiations isn’t that surprising.

For one, the plan faces lots of scrutiny for the previous ties between former-House Speaker Mike Madigan’s staff and ComEd – nobody wants to be perceived as going too far to help a massive, profitable company that already benefited from previous graft (ComEd agreed to pay $200 million in fines to resolve an investigation into its bribery schemes). This new deal calls for Exelon, ComEd’s parent, to get nearly $700 million in ratepayer support for three of its nuke plants (two of which they’re threatening to shut down this year if no help is given).

Second, the package is a highly political and lucrative deal within the left, with interest groups fighting over the details. Gov. J.B. Pritzker summed up the competition saying: “This is not two interested parties – unions and environmentalists – this was not that. This was an eight-sided negotiation [and] very difficult to bring people together.”