First, we get rid of the four regional superintendents, obliterate their individual fiefdoms and ax the lone high school superintendent. So far so good, as these individuals were not exactly delivering sterling outcomes.
More.
First, we get rid of the four regional superintendents, obliterate their individual fiefdoms and ax the lone high school superintendent. So far so good, as these individuals were not exactly delivering sterling outcomes.
More.
The funding restoration will reinstate Tizón’s position, as well as positions for three academic coaches in the Office of Latine Achievement. Under the previous funding cuts, OLA would have had no operating budget. Now, it will have reduced capacity, but the office will continue in its current form.
But tensions over funding for the Office of Black Student Achievement — and the role of school board members in setting the budget — spilled over in the May 13 school board meeting.
The Office of Black Student Achievement, which had a $2.2 million budget last year, is slated for cuts of about $750,000 — more than a third of its budget. As a result, it will reduce its high school course offerings by about half, as well as cutting programming for elementary and middle school students.
more.
Liya Palagashvili and Revana Sharfuddin
These trade-offs arise not because unions are uniquely “aggressive,” but because US labor laws promote a legally protected union monopoly that crowds out constructive representation and worker voice. Drawing on 147 studies, we find that when the monopoly face dominates and delivers seemingly “big wins” at the bargaining table, companies respond to wage pressure by trimming R&D, cutting capital, reducing company growth, and ultimately shrinking jobs for unionized workers—dynamics that explain roughly 55 percent of the decline in the Rust Belt’s share of manufacturing employment between 1950 and 2000.
——
Related: Act 10
Miami-Dade County Public Schools, the nation’s third-largest school district, is at the forefront of a fast-moving national experiment to embed generative A.I. technologies into teaching and learning. Over the last year, the district has trained more than 1,000 educators on new A.I. tools and is now introducing Google chatbots for more than 105,000 high schoolers — the largest U.S. school district deployment of its kind to date.
It is a sharp turnabout from two years ago, when districts like Miami blocked A.I. chatbots over fears of mass cheating and misinformation. The chatbots, which are trained on databases of texts, can quickly generate humanish emails, class quizzes and lesson plans. They also make stuff up, which could mislead students.
Now some formerly wary schools are introducing generative A.I. tools with the idea of helping students prepare for evolving job demands. Miami school leaders say they also want students to learn how to critically assess new A.I. tools and use them responsibly.
The liberal exodus from X to Bluesky created a kind of real-world social-science experiment. It was as if progressives on one side and conservatives and centrists on the other sorted themselves into two separate laboratory dishes. (I don’t want to make toomuch of this; there are still plenty of liberals on X, and both platforms have lots of people mostly interested in nonpolitical topics. But stay with me.) With the most passionate progressives in one petri dish, and with conservatives and MAGA types now unleashed in the other, scientists could get out their notebooks and watch what kind of cultures emerged.
I’ve been on Twitter/X since its earliest days, and I still find it a useful way to keep tabs on the many topics I follow. In the Musk era, my feed on X has become noticeably more chaotic, with a higher proportion of random accounts shouting angrily into the void. Sometimes those voices come from the MAGA right (usually saying something about “treason” or “RINOS”). But there is plenty of anger from the left as well. For example, any post supportive of Israel is immediately attacked by nasty pro-Hamas accounts. I don’t love X’s somewhat uglier vibe, but I accept the trade-off. I’m willing to tolerate a few angry or idiotic posts in exchange for knowing that right-wing views aren’t being deliberately buried.
Despite the controversy, X has hardly become a conservative echo chamber. A late 2024 Pew Research Center poll found that news consumers on X are almost precisely balanced between Democrats and Republicans; two years earlier, Democrats outnumbered Republicans on the site more than two to one. I suspect that the progressives who feel threatened by right-wing “hate” have simply never experienced a cultural environment where conservatives speak as loudly as liberals. And, against all odds, Musk’s business strategy seems to be working. Though X’s total number of users has dropped, the site’s financial health is improving. Analysts estimate that the company’s total value is approaching the $44 billion Musk paid for it in 2022, a valuation most experts (including Musk himself) considered wildly inflated at the time.
Last year I was battling the greatest entertainment system the world ever unleashed. A student would listen to my pleas, say they would get up, and then immediately fuck off on their phone again. Why would you play in the gym when you could sit against the wall and watch endless entertainment personally curated for your tastes?
Now I battle boredom, and that’s a winnable fight. Now when I give my two chicks speech [telling pupils they might not like doing something, but they have to], they usually respond by participating. That’s because the other option is boredom. Sit there, do nothing, and look out the non-existent windows our school doesn’t have. I’m not fighting against brilliant social scientists getting paid millions to figure out ways to capture human attention, I’m fighting against sitting on your ass doing nothing. And my class is awesome compared to boredom.
Now don’t get me wrong. This isn’t a magic bullet. Banning phones won’t save Gen-Z. I once watched our dean hand cellphones back to students in the cafeteria. When she rolled the cellphone cart through, it was like watching a crowd of hyenas catching the scent of stinking flesh. Kids stopped conversations mid-sentence and lifted their heads to watch that cart roll by.
A few weeks into her sophomore year of college, Leigh Burrell got a notification that made her stomach drop.
She had received a zero on an assignment worth 15 percent of her final grade in a required writing course. In a brief note, her professor explained that he believed she had outsourced the composition of her paper — a mock cover letter — to an A.I. chatbot.
“My heart just freaking stops,” said Ms. Burrell, 23, a computer science major at the University of Houston-Downtown.
But Ms. Burrell’s submission was not, in fact, the instantaneous output of a chatbot. According to Google Docs editing history that was reviewed by The New York Times, she had drafted and revised the assignment over the course of two days. It was flagged anyway by a service offered by the plagiarism-detection company Turnitin that aims to identify text generated by artificial intelligence.
The U.S. has lost its last triple-A credit rating.
Moody’s Ratings downgraded the U.S. government on Friday, citing large fiscal deficits and rising interest costs.
Expanding budget deficits mean U.S. government borrowing will rise at an accelerating rate, pushing interest rates up over the long term, Moody’s said. The firm said Friday that it didn’t believe that any current budget proposals under consideration by lawmakers would do anything significant to reduce the persistent gap between government spending and revenues.
The move strips the U.S. of its last remaining triple-A credit rating from a major ratings firm, following similar cuts by Fitch Ratings in 2023 and S&P Global Ratings in 2011. Moody’s downgraded the U.S. to Aa1, a rating also held by Austria and Finland.
“Successive U.S. administrations and Congress have failed to agree on measures to reverse the trend of large annual fiscal deficits and growing interest costs,” Moody’s wrote in a statement.
Instead of long, abstruse playcalls radioed into a quarterback’s ear and getting drowned out by tens of thousands screaming fans, each play would just appear in front of each player’s eyes on a wristband. It would completely transform the way the game looks—and even how it’s played.
And as it happens, it’s now closer to a reality than ever before.
In a move that fell under the radar of most football fans, the league that oversees high-school football in Texas just approved a change permitting the use of these types of wearable devices. And while Friday night football in the Lone Star state might seem a long way from NFL stadiums, recent history shows that high-school fields now serve as the breeding grounds for the next stages of the game’s evolution—even when those ideas seem completely radical.
The spread offense and the pass-happy “Air Raid” scheme were both popularized at Texas high schools before trickling up to the pro game. The latest innovation might be less of a schematic advancement than a technological one.
Patrick Brown, via a kind reader:
By asking students to consider the statistics showing that both adults and kids do better in a household with married parents, these curricula can open up conversations about what success truly means. Instead of a strict focus on avoiding teen pregnancy, these discussions celebrate the meaning and joy that parenthood in the right context can offer. These curricula could be amplified by lessons, such as those passed in Idaho and Tennessee, that require high-school biology classes to teach the basics of fetal development, such as when a heartbeat begins, to help students gain a greater appreciation for human life.
The success sequence is also politically popular. A 2023 poll of parents across five Sun Belt states found high levels of support for teaching students about the sequence in public schools. Nearly three-quarters of parents polled said that they “strongly” or “somewhat” supported teaching it, while only 12% of parents were “strongly” opposed.
Parents are responsible for the moral formation of their children, but they want schools to support rather than undermine their efforts. Career exploration classes help students ponder what they might want to do but don’t help them think about the kind of person they want to become. If the success sequence can kick-start conversations about what it truly means to flourish, it will be well worth it.
Last week I had dinner with three friends. We all went to the UW. We’ve all had successful careers and long-term marriages. A couple of us have raised a total of six successful children. And yet, we didn’t go to Harvard or aspired to. In fact, we grew up at a time when middle class kids like us didn’t shop around for schools. Nobody went on a tour of campuses. We could afford the UW, so that’s where we went.
My point is that people like Brooks — and I like Brooks’ perspective about 90% of the time — live in a world that is sealed off from the lives lived by 95% of Americans who don’t live or die by their GPA, their SAT scores or the dream of an Ivy League education.
Konrad Putzier, Douglas Belkin and Anthony DeBarros:
“It’s almost like you’re watching the town die,” said Kalib McGruder, who was born in Macomb and worked 28 years for the Western Illinois campus police department.
Macomb is at the heart of a new Rust Belt: Across the U.S., colleges are faltering and so are the once booming towns around them. Enrollment is down at many of the nation’s public colleges and universities, widening the gap between high-profile campuses and struggling schools. Starting next year, there will be fewer high-school graduates for the foreseeable future.
The fallout extends to downtown Macomb. Sullivan Taylor Coffee House, located in the corner of a stately 130-year-old building not far from campus, sits mostly empty during the semester. Owner Brandon Thompson has cashed out retirement savings, hit the limits of his credit cards, even canceled his home internet to keep the doors open.
CORE received 64% of votes to defeat a challenge from the Respect Educate Advocate Lead — or REAL — caucus.
Friday’s results mean Davis Gates will remain as union president, joining the rest of the CORE slate of CTU leadership with vice president Jackson Potter, recording secretary Vicki Kurzydlo and financial secretary Diane Castro.
The coverup of Mr. Biden’s mental decline will go down as one of the great scandals of modern politics. By refusing to admit what voters could so clearly see, Democrats denied their party an open primary. Once Mr. Biden imploded, they handed Kamala Harris the nomination without debate.
Had Mr. Biden bowed out in 2023, Republicans might also have been more open to nominees other than Mr. Trump. Instead, Democrats turned to lawfare in an attempt to disqualify Mr. Trump, which solidified his hold on GOP voters. Democrats and the press are now appalled by Mr. Trump’s second term. They would do better to think upon, and seek contrition for, their own role in making it possible.
Advances in generative AI also play a role. Shopify CEO Tobi Lütke recently told employees that the e-commerce company won’t make new hires unless managers can prove AI isn’t capable of doing the job. Other business leaders are warning their staff to adopt more AI—or else.
“AI is coming for your jobs. Heck, it’s coming for my job too. This is a wake-up call,” Micha Kaufman, CEO of the freelance marketplace Fiverr, wrote in a staff memo last month. Those “who will not wake up and understand the new reality fast are, unfortunately, doomed.
Students don’t want to be accused of cheating, so they’re using artificial intelligence to make sure their school essays sound human.
Teachers use AI-detection software to identify AI-generated work. Students, in turn, are pre-emptively running their original writing through the same tools, to see if anything might be flagged for sounding too robotic.
Miles Pulvers, a 21-year-old student at Northeastern University in Boston, says he never uses AI to write essays, but he runs all of them through an AI detector before submitting them.
“I take great pride in my writing,” says Pulvers. “Before AI, I had peace of mind that whatever I would submit would be accepted. Now I see some of my writing being flagged as possibly being AI-generated when it’s not. It’s kind of annoying, but it’s part of the deal in 2025.”
The final business year for the Power Five conferences, as college sports fans have come to know them, was not exactly business as usual. With schools’ affiliations already beginning to change, and various legal entanglements going on, three of the five conferences reported declines in total revenue on their federal tax records for their 2024 fiscal years – and the Power Five’s combined total revenue very narrowly declined.
That’s far from a cause for alarm, but it is the first such year-over-year decrease in a non-pandemic-affected year since USA TODAY Sports began compiling these records by obtaining data reaching back to fiscal 2011, when the Big East Conference still was playing football and there were six power conferences. In most years, the annual increase has been at least $150 million.
And that may well return to being the power-conference norm, as the Big Ten and Southeastern conferences appear headed toward revenue booms for their ongoing 2025 fiscal years that likely will take each to at least $1 billion, and the Pac-12’s demise and dispersal will help boost income for the Atlantic Coast Conference and the Big 12.
The Illinois State Board of Education agreed Wednesday to move ahead with a process to change the state’s testing system, though the exact details still are being worked out. That process will include creating new “cut scores,” or the lowest score needed for a student to be sorted into broad categories of achievement on state assessments.
If approved in August, the new cut scores would be applied to the tests taken by students this spring and reported publicly in October. The changes are likely to send the public a very different message about how students are doing on reading and math tests.
Proposed changes to the state’s testing system come at a time when schools in Illinois and around the country are still dealing with the academic fallout of the COVID pandemic. Other states, including Wisconsin, Oklahoma, Alaska, and New York, have made similar changes to their testing systems, according to The 74.
Third to eighth graders in Illinois saw progress in reading last year — even exceeding proficiency levels pre-pandemic — but math scores still lagged behind past years, according to the state’s 2024 report card. Scores on the National Assessment of Educational Progress, or NAEP, remained stagnant.
——
Did taxpayer funded Wisconsin DPI Superintendent Underly Juice Test Scores for Reelection?
notes and links on Incumbent DPI Superintendent Jill Underly (back story).
Underly supports eliminating our one elementary teacher content knowledge requirement, the Foundations of Reading(FORT)
Civics: Why and how was Jill Underly Re-elected? (a bit of uniparty analysis as well). And.
My Question to Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers on Teacher Mulligans and our Disastrous Reading Results
“An emphasis on adult employment”
The data clearly indicate that being able to read is not a requirement for graduation at (Madison) East, especially if you are black or Hispanic”
2017: West High Reading Interventionist Teacher’s Remarks to the School Board on Madison’s Disastrous Reading Results
The research bears out the pessimism. In the past two years, there have been dramatic increases in the numbers of students using generative AI to do their work. In the UK, at university level, the number of students using AI for assessments went up from 53 per cent in 2024 to 88 per cent in 2025. Among 13- to 18-year-olds generative AI use went from 37 per cent in 2023 to 77 per cent in 2024.
Not only that, but you can’t spot its use: AI detectors don’t work. They miss real plagiarism and accuse human work of being plagiarised.
In short, the growing and undetectable use of generative AI poses a huge threat to the integrity of assessments, and by extension to the integrity of education.
In the worst-case scenario, which may already be here, we end up with a kabuki dance where students pretend to write essays and teachers pretend to mark them.
More information on the new NIL clearinghouse – “NIL Go” – is being distributed to schools, including this two-page memo that details concepts, much of what has been reported but now formalized in writing to school administrators.
——
A memo obtained by FOS sheds new light on how the approval process will work for NIL collective deals. Industry experts are skeptical it will work.
———
If a deal is flagged by the clearinghouse as pay-for-play, the athlete can still accept it…just w the understanding there’s a risk of eligibility concerns.
——-
We have a last minute amicus brief filed by USA Diving in opposition to the House settlement.
It takes the NCAA to task for not protecting the interests of athletes and calls the roster limits “anticompetitive.”
It seems that opposition to the House settlement grows by the day.
The best part, though, was when Sulzberger claimed that the Times is just as tough on Democrats as it is on Republicans, and as an example, he earnestly cited the paper’s coverage of Biden’s plainly disintegrating mental faculties.
“President Joe Biden and his aides, for example, frequently lashed out at journalists and news organizations who dared to ask questions about his age and fitness, even as they went to historic lengths to avoid unscripted exchanges with reporters,” he said. “I know this firsthand, because Times journalists reported deeply on these questions and called attention to his evasion of the press. President Biden’s White House and his supporters attacked them for it constantly.”
Fourth and eighth-grade students attending Department of Defense Education Activity (DoDEA) schools led the nation in scoring on the 2024 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Reading and Mathematics Assessments.
DoDEA students’ average scale scores ranged from 14 to 25 points higher than corresponding national average scores and held steady while national average scores mostly decreased.
“I am delighted that DoDEA has once again performed exceptionally well on the National Assessment of Educational Progress,” said DoDEA Director, Dr. Beth Schiavino-Narvaez. “Credit for this success belongs to our incredible teachers, administrators, and staff of DoDEA, and most importantly to our students and their families, for all their hard work and dedication. Our relentless pursuit of continuous improvement has empowered our mission to deliver excellence in education to every student, every day, everywhere.”
State officials are still withholding a $16.6 million special education payment to the district because of its late financial reporting last year, Bucher said, pending better progress on MPS’ corrective action plan.
The state Department of Public Instruction needs MPS’ reports, which include audited financial statements from the 2023-24 school year, to calculate final general aid payments to all Wisconsin school districts.
Asked whether DPI was confident in MPS’ ability to hit the May 30 deadline for other reports, Bucher said state officials were “concerned about the progress toward meeting the goals and the potential impacts.”
Three other school districts are also late filing the same information DPI is seeking from MPS by May 30, Bucher said. Every district has already submitted the information MPS was due to submit May 16.
Grade 9 students in the province will be getting a mandatory math makeover that education officials expect will add up to better results and an improved learning experience in the core subject.
Manitoba Education has overhauled the curriculum for incoming high schoolers to expose all students to budgeting 101 and increase foundational numeracy lessons. And the amount of instruction is being doubled.
Starting in September 2027, a new mandatory mathematics course will span the entirety of every student’s Grade 9 school year. The rollout is being phased in with a pilot in selected schools scheduled for this fall.
The course is slated to replace four existing options — Grade 9 Mathematics, Transitional Mathematics, Transitional Mathematics I and Transitional Mathematics II.
Harvard’s school of public health, which relies on federal grants for almost half its budget, has conducted layoffs and reduced graduate-student admissions. It has pinched pennies on everyday spending, cutting coffee in the faculty lounge as well as catering at meetings, and removing some printers and desk phones. A spokeswoman for the T.H. Chan School of Public Health said it has lost nearly every direct federal grant it receives.
Garber said Wednesday the university would contribute an additional $250 million to backfill some of the lost research funds “for a transitional period as we continue to work with our researchers to identify alternative funding sources.”
Institutions will do what they can “to protect the academic core as long as possible,” said Erin Hennessy, an executive vice president at TVP Communications, a higher-education communications firm. That means going after easier cuts first, she said, such as not filling vacant positions, deferring building projects and consolidating departments, before touching the faculty.
So far, the undergraduate experience hasn’t changed at most universities, but cuts in the coming months could have a significant impact by fall. Many universities implemented hiring freezes in March, after the Trump administration announced caps to research costs funded by the National Institutes of Health. Actions such as layoffs haven’t yet become widespread.
Mike Knetter talks with two Badger economists about the danger of rising federal budget deficits — and politicians who are afraid to face them.
The UW system’s 2023-25 biennial budget is $13.7 billion. About 58 percent of funding comes from tuition and fees, 24 percent comes from the federal government and 18 percent comes from the state.
Evers’ budget includes $856M spending increase for UW
Gov. Tony Evers’ 2025-27 biennial budget proposal includes $856 million for the UW system, the largest increase in state history.
Rothman said the budget increase would bring UW to the middle nationally in funding and provide the system with essential investments to preserve the quality and advance the innovation that Wisconsin expects of the system’s 13 universities.
“We’re not going to have the teachers, the nurses, the engineers and the data scientists that are necessary,” Rothman said. “And it has a real impact on students of lower socioeconomic means, because we don’t have the resources to really make this opportunity available to anyone in Wisconsin who has the passion and has the ability.”
Following the posting of the preprint paper “Artificial Intelligence, Scientific Discovery, and Product Innovation” on arXiv in November 2024, concerns were raised about the integrity of the research. MIT conducted an internal, confidential review and concluded that the paper should be withdrawn from public discourse.
In an effort to correct the research record, MIT has contacted arXiv to formally request that the paper be withdrawn and The Quarterly Journal of Economics, where it had been submitted. The letter on behalf of the Committee on Discipline to arXiv states:
“Earlier this year, the COD conducted a confidential internal review based upon allegations it received regarding certain aspects of this paper. While student privacy laws and MIT policy prohibit the disclosure of the outcome of this review, we are writing to inform you that MIT has no confidence in the provenance, reliability or validity of the data and has no confidence in the veracity of the research contained in the paper. Based upon this finding, we also believe that the inclusion of this paper in arXiv may violate arXiv’s Code of Conduct.
“Our understanding is that only authors of papers appearing on arXiv can submit withdrawal requests. We have directed the author to submit such a request, but to date, the author has not done so. Therefore, in an effort to clarify the research record, MIT respectfully request that the paper be marked as withdrawn from arXiv as soon as possible.”
——
Justin Lahart.
more.
In 2022, I highlighted Ian Ayres and Barry Nalebuff’s proposal that young people should borrow to invest in the stock market. Why? Most people invest gradually, which leads to a concentration of stock holdings late in life. By borrowing early, young investors can spread market risk more evenly across their lifetime, much like diversifying across assets. Put differently, a young person’s biggest asset is their future labor income. Borrowing to invest reduces overexposure to that single asset, effectively diversifying their portfolio away from specific human capital and toward financial capital.
I supported the idea writing that “I agree with Ayres and Nalebuff that young people should be [at least] 100% in equities” but I didn’t expect people to go beyond this until the idea became standardized in a similar way to home mortgages. I wrote, “It could be standardized, however, with retirement planning products.”
Well, we now have our first product in this category, Basic Capital. Basic Capital is a mortgage for investing in stocks and bonds. You put in $1 and you get $5 of investment. Moreover, you cannot lose more than you put in. How is that possible? The investments are constrained–85% of it goes to bonds and 15% to equity but remember that 15% is on $5 rather than $1 so instead of investing $1 in stocks you are investing $.75 in stocks and $4.25 in bonds. The net result is broader exposure at lower individual risk. Whether it’s a compelling product depends on fees and execution, which seem high, but the underlying idea is innovative, and I’m excited to see how products in this new category evolve.
Compare the foundation of interdisciplinary Civics units to another interdisciplinary academic unit created in part to “solve” a campus problem: Black Studies (or African American Studies), protested into existence in the late 1960s. A strike founded San Francisco State’s College of Ethnic Studies in 1968, followed by calls across the country, including the armed occupation of Cornell’s Willard Straight Hall in 1969, which forced administrators to cede curricular authority to scholars and disciplines once excluded.
Black Studies undoubtedly solved the problem it was designed to: it pluralized the curriculum, diversified campuses across the country, supported new research and faculty lines. Universities took more seriously history and research questions overlooked or ignored. Students immediately flocked to the new courses (student newspapers talk of “overflow” and “standing room only”). Demand was never a problem. So by any account, Black Studies was successful.
Compare the trajectory of Civics, emerging largely from the South, flush with cash, with recurring public appropriations, protected status outside ordinary departmental vetoes, and a legislated mandate. Florida’s SB 266 not only created the Hamilton Center; it ordered every public campus to “prioritize instruction in Western and American political thought.” North Carolina’s trustees used the same language to justify the new center as did Ohio for the Chase Center and similar centers at other Ohio universities. These centers present themselves as having already inherited a canon – “great books,” “Western civilization,” the American founding.
TV: I wonder about the tenability of ascribing a policy like extended school closures to a “laptop class.” Support for school reopenings did not fall neatly along educational lines. The parents most reluctant to send their kids back to school in blue cities in the spring of 2021 were black and Hispanic, research has consistently found, not white. And the most organized opposition to school reopenings, as you know, came from teachers’ unions, who can hardly be considered stormtroopers of the managerial elite. What really drove blue states to impose restrictions on education so far beyond those of red states and Western Europe?
FL & SM: Our argument is that Covid policy was profoundly shaped by class bias. The knowledge workers advocating for pandemic restrictions—public health officials, academics, think tank scholars, and opinion leaders in media and journalism—suffered vastly less from pandemic policies than economically and politically disadvantaged groups did. Pandemic policies, including but not confined to school closures, had profoundly inequitable effects along class lines. Knowledge workers were able to migrate their work online, enjoyed opportunities for travel and remote work, had the time and experience with technology to assist their children with remote schooling or the money to hire tutors, watched their asset values inflate during the pandemic, and never missed a paycheck. It was easy for such people to be blind to the harsh costs being paid by others, including the essential workers, disproportionately low-wage, who had to continue on the job regardless of their age or health status (about 1/3 of the workforce). Single parents defined as essential workers had to keep on working in person even when schools and daycares were closed. Millions of Americans lost their jobs when closures were imposed and, in many cases, had to wait months for their unemployment benefits from overwhelmed state systems. Learning losses were most severeamong poor students, racial minorities, those struggling academically before the pandemic, and those with learning disabilities. Small business owners disproportionately saw their businesses close and close permanently.
———
The taxpayer funded Madison School District long used Reading Recovery…
The data clearly indicate that being able to read is not a requirement for graduation at (Madison) East, especially if you are black or Hispanic”
My Question to Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers on Teacher Mulligans and our Disastrous Reading Results
2017: West High Reading Interventionist Teacher’s Remarks to the School Board on Madison’s Disastrous Reading Results
Madison’s taxpayer supported K-12 school district, despite spending far more than most, has long tolerated disastrous reading results.
“An emphasis on adult employment”
Wisconsin Public Policy Forum Madison School District Report[PDF]
WEAC: $1.57 million for Four Wisconsin Senators
Friday Afternoon Veto: Governor Evers Rejects AB446/SB454; an effort to address our long term, disastrous reading results
Booked, but can’t read (Madison): functional literacy, National citizenship and the new face of Dred Scott in the age of mass incarceration.
When A Stands for Average: Students at the UW-Madison School of Education Receive Sky-High Grades. How Smart is That?
Lighthouse is now home to the largest number of voucher students in Madison. A majority of the school’s students identify as Hispanic or Black, and nearly all are from low-income households. The school’s website says, “We are facing unprecedented demand with 150 children on our waitlist as of fall 2024.”
Lighthouse and other private voucher schools have grown as the state has continuously increased support for choice programs. Two years ago, lawmakers approved the largest investment in state history for Wisconsin’s voucher programs.
A cap on the number of students from each school district who can participatein the statewide voucher program has risen one percentage point each year since 2017-18. By the 2026-27 school year, the enrollment limit will be lifted.
This school year, over 58,000 Wisconsin students are attending private schools using vouchers, about 3,800 more than last school year, according to Department of Public Instruction figures. Over 400 private schools — including 11 in Madison — intend to participate in one of Wisconsin’s three school choice programs next fall, up from 344 this year.
Over 500 students are using vouchers to attend private schools in Madison. More than 25,000 are enrolled in the city’s public schools.
——-
The taxpayer funded Madison School District long used Reading Recovery…
The data clearly indicate that being able to read is not a requirement for graduation at (Madison) East, especially if you are black or Hispanic”
My Question to Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers on Teacher Mulligans and our Disastrous Reading Results
2017: West High Reading Interventionist Teacher’s Remarks to the School Board on Madison’s Disastrous Reading Results
Madison’s taxpayer supported K-12 school district, despite spending far more than most, has long tolerated disastrous reading results.
“An emphasis on adult employment”
Wisconsin Public Policy Forum Madison School District Report[PDF]
WEAC: $1.57 million for Four Wisconsin Senators
Friday Afternoon Veto: Governor Evers Rejects AB446/SB454; an effort to address our long term, disastrous reading results
Booked, but can’t read (Madison): functional literacy, National citizenship and the new face of Dred Scott in the age of mass incarceration.
When A Stands for Average: Students at the UW-Madison School of Education Receive Sky-High Grades. How Smart is That?
Pointing to increases in the number of homeless and poor students, the Sun Prairie School District and its foundation will launch a program in September to provide free, healthy snacks to middle and high schoolers during the school day.
The program, called Food for Thought, will make snacks such as dried mango, cheese sticks and protein bars available to staff at the district’s three middle schools and three high schools, who can then provide them to students.
It is expected to cost about $38,000 in its first year, all covered by private donations, according to Rebecca Ketelsen, executive director of the Sun Prairie Education Foundation, and comes as a six-week, initial pilot program got underway this month to deliver $4,300 worth of snacks to the schools.
“Nutrition is the foundation of learning,” Stephanie Leonard, district assistant superintendent of teaching, learning and equity, said in a news release announcing the effort. “When students are well-fed, they are more engaged, more confident, and better able to thrive in the classroom.”
It was 2019 when Jesse Sharkey won reelection to lead the Chicago Teachers Union (CTU). A political activist who masquerades as a classroom educator, Sharkey overcame Members First’s slate at the close of the polls.
Sharkey’s return to lead the CTU extended the iron grip of the Caucus of Rank-and-File Educators (CORE) over the union and within months of his victory at the ballot box, the CTU went on strike. Three years later, in 2022, Sharkey decision to stand down from running for a third term ushered in rule under Stacy Davis Gates.
Unlike 2019, in which Sharkey faced only one opponent, Davis Gates’ field of challengers swelled to include a slate from the newly formed Respect-Educate-Advocate-Lead (REAL) Caucus. In the three-way race, the controversial Davis Gates emerged victorious with 56 percent of the vote.
Under Davis Gates, the CTU amplified its political activism to place CTU organizer Brandon Johnson into City Hall, and the fissures which separate and isolate the three dominant caucuses deepened and widened. A despot who is intolerant of even the slightest din of dissent, Davis Gates’ prospects for reelection rose when Members First declined to form a slate for the May 16th CTU elections.
——-
Christopher Rufo and Ryan Thorpe:
We’ve obtained a trove of internal documents that reveal Harvard’s racial favoritism in faculty and administrative hiring. The university’s DEI programs are more than “unconscious bias” training. They are vectors for systematic discrimination against disfavored groups: namely, white men. As one Harvard researcher told us, “endless evidence” suggests that the university continues to discriminate against the supposed oppressor class in hiring and promotions.
For years, Harvard’s DEI department has explicitly sought to engineer a more racially “diverse” faculty pool. The university-wide Inclusive Hiring Initiative provided “guidelines and training” for those involved in the hiring process and was explicitly tied to Harvard’s DEI goals. The stated mission of the initiative is to “[i]nstill an understanding of how departments can leverage the selection process” to build “an increasingly diverse workforce.”
In another hiring guide, “Best Practices for Conducting Faculty Searches,” the university recommends several discriminatory practices. At the beginning of the hiring process, Harvard instructs search committees to “ensure that the early lists include women and minorities” and to “consider reading the applications of women and minorities first.” The university counsels that committee chairs should “continually monitor” the racial composition of the candidate list and, as they narrow it down, “attend to all women and minorities on the long list.”
More.
Palo Alto schools are doing away with Honors courses in the latest assault on excellence.
Starting in September, freshmen will no longer have the option of taking a more rigorous Honors Biology class. Instead, the district will have one “foundational” course.
The Palo Alto Unified School District voted in January to nix the advanced class after an hours-long debate with dozens of concerned members of the public in attendance. Honors English has already been sidelined.
Proponents argue that “de-laning” — removing different “lanes” for students based on achievement — will promote equity and encourage all kids to pursue science throughout their high school career.
——
Related:
Madison’s ongoing one size fits all experiments, English 10
If so, we should see it in pension plan withdrawal rates. Pension plans use their historical data to make future projections, and those projections feed into the plan’s estimates for how much money they will need to pay future benefits.
Say a state has a 5-year vesting period. If teachers truly valued their pension benefit, there should be some contingent of 4-year veterans who stick it out one more year just to reach that fifth year. But when I looked at this question with Kelly Robson Foster, we could not find a single state that operationalizes this in their withdrawal assumptions.
I’ll show you a couple. First up is California. They have a five-year vesting requirement. And yet here are their withdrawal rate assumptions. As you can see, they assume a bigger drop-off from four to five years than they do from years five to six. This is exactly opposite of what you’d expect if California teachers were somehow sticking around to qualify for a CalSTRS pension. Instead, it looks more like a fairly steady decrease, and the pension incentive is doing nothing at all.
New polling data shows what you may already suspect: your experience of losing friends since the 2024 election of Donald Trump is absolutely real – if very divided depending on your political tribe.
When national pollster Cygnal offered me the opportunity to suggest a question or two for their latest national survey, it was a chance to put to the test the experience of many Americans I know: in the past six months, they’ve lost at least one friend over the result of the 2024 election. The direction of lost friends seemed very politically consistent in…
Stranger still, illegal aliens were at times given precedence over citizens—as immigration law was simply discarded.
Without IDs, illegal aliens boarded U.S. flights, while the government ordered citizens to obtain more secure “real” IDs.
Some 8,500 veteran soldiers were drummed out of the military for refusing the experimental mRNA vaccinations. Yet 10 million simply walked across the southern border into America, without a care from the Biden administration whether they were vaccinated, ill, or had criminal records.
Any American citizen pulled over for speeding with an invalid driver’s license, while trafficking eight illegal aliens without identification, would be jailed and charged with felony counts. Not Abrego Garcia—the violent spousal abuser, M-13 gang-member, and previously deported illegal alien. He was neither arrested nor even cited by the officers who pulled him over.
One of the great hallmarks of Roman civilization and subsequent Western civilization was its ability to create large cities by importing clean water, removing waste through sewers, and collecting garbage from the streets. Even in the age before microbiology, ancient and premodern city planners knew the connection between cleanliness and epidemics and how to lessen disease through sanitation.
Many of the students are lagging from COVID-19 pandemic disruptions, they said. Others lack the organizational skills to be successful. An entire generation has lost the ability to do math in their heads. And most just need an adult at school who cares about them.
—-
The article fails to include total k-12 $pending data.
——
US debt clock
The taxpayer funded Madison School District long used Reading Recovery…
The data clearly indicate that being able to read is not a requirement for graduation at (Madison) East, especially if you are black or Hispanic”
My Question to Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers on Teacher Mulligans and our Disastrous Reading Results
2017: West High Reading Interventionist Teacher’s Remarks to the School Board on Madison’s Disastrous Reading Results
Madison’s taxpayer supported K-12 school district, despite spending far more than most, has long tolerated disastrous reading results.
“An emphasis on adult employment”
Wisconsin Public Policy Forum Madison School District Report[PDF]
WEAC: $1.57 million for Four Wisconsin Senators
Friday Afternoon Veto: Governor Evers Rejects AB446/SB454; an effort to address our long term, disastrous reading results
Booked, but can’t read (Madison): functional literacy, National citizenship and the new face of Dred Scott in the age of mass incarceration.
When A Stands for Average: Students at the UW-Madison School of Education Receive Sky-High Grades. How Smart is That?
Since ChatGPT launched in late 2022, students have been among its most avid adopters. When the rapid growth in users stalled in the late spring of ’23, it briefly looked like the AI bubble might be popping, but growth resumed that September; the cause of the decline was simply summer break. Even as other kinds of organizations struggle to use a tool that can be strikingly powerful and surprisingly inept in turn, AI’s utility to students asked to produce 1,500 words on Hamlet or the Great Leap Forward was immediately obvious, and is the source of the current campaigns by OpenAI and others to offer student discounts, as a form of customer acquisition.
Every year, 15 million or so undergraduates in the United States produce papers and exams running to billions of words. While the output of any given course is student assignments — papers, exams, research projects, and so on — the product of that course is student experience. “Learning results from what the student does and thinks,” as the great educational theorist Herbert Simon once noted, “and only as a result of what the student does and thinks.” The assignment itself is a MacGuffin, with the shelf life of sour cream and an economic value that rounds to zero dollars. It is valuable only as a way to compel student effort and thought.
Andrew C. Johnston, Maggie R. Jones & Nolan G. Pope
Nearly a third of American children experience parental divorce before adulthood. To understand its consequences, we use linked tax and Census records for over 5 million children to examine how divorce affects family arrangements and children’s long-term outcomes. Following divorce, parents move apart, household income falls, parents work longer hours, families move more frequently, and households relocate to poorer neighborhoods with less economic opportunity. This bundle of changes in family circumstances suggests multiple channels through which divorce may affect children’s development and outcomes. In the years following divorce, we observe sharp increases in teen births and child mortality. To examine long-run effects on children, we compare siblings with different lengths of exposure to the same divorce. We find that parental divorce reduces children’s adult earnings and college residence while increasing incarceration, mortality, and teen births. Changes in household income, neighborhood quality, and parent proximity account for 25 to 60 percent of these divorce effects.
I don’t know about you, dear reader, but the first notion that struck me after I read this was What did their parents do to these academics. However, evidence for that being impossible for me to obtain, we’ll look at the paper instead.
Let’s take the easy bits first. Is pregnancy necessary for human survival? Some “gender” theorists deny it, but the answer is yes. And not only for humans! Indeed, this thing called, or what used to be called, sexual reproduction is in fact not uncommon out in the world. Even snails must suffer the indignity of penetration and the resulting external organisms invading their females’ bodies.
And not just snails. Praying mantises, where at least the females always take their revenge, deer, birds, worms, sharks, ticks, and every kind of creepy crawly you can name spend some portion of their short lives trying to create this “disease” in one other, and with all show of enthusiasm. This being so, and given the terrific rate of reproduction of most species, the world must be filled to overflowing with “disease.” Is this lamentable? Only if all “diseases” are bad.
This lays bare our academics’ central problem. As we’ll see, for every definition of disease they can imagine, they discover to their amazement they can squeeze pregnancy into it. Therefore, they reason, pregnancy must be a disease. This follows, but the conclusion falls into what I call the Big Muscles Fallacy.
The BMF happens when an explanation for some thing must be had, one is give or proposed, and the person offering it says it must be true because they can’t think of anything else. They claim Big Intellectual Muscles. I write in Everything You Believe Is Wrong (second edition is forthcoming) this would be like a Harvard graduate looking at a math problem and declaring it is unsovlable because they themself cannot solve it. Academics as a species are the most prone to this Fallacy, for obvious reasons.
The average self-paced online course has a completion rate of 5-15%. Perhaps you’ve had the experience of enrolling in a self-paced course only to drop it midway through. Maybe, like me, you even spent money on an online course only to drop out.
It turns out, if you meet up with friends every week to take a course, two things happen:
My friends discovered that the true value of school is the social container. The best classes in the world are freely available online. But going through an online class alone requires willpower that many of us don’t have. It’s easy and fun to do focused work when you’re doing it with your friends! And to come back every week until you finish what you set out to do.
More than 20 years later, what Mailer describes has only grown worse. The most soulful and interesting piece of journalism I’ve read recently is the book You Wanna Be on Top?: A Memoir of Makeovers, Manipulation, and Not Becoming America’s Next Top Model by Sarah Hartshorne. Hartshorne writes about her small town upbringing and the bad treatment and nasty personalities she found when she became a model. It’s more affecting than anything I’ve read in The Washington Post or New York Times in several years. Hartshorne is beautiful—and also tough. In her book, she talks about the book that encouraged her as a young girl to want to be a model: Of Women and Their Elegance—by Norman Mailer.
Mailer drew a correlation between physical toughness and great journalism. In his new book Eminent Jews: Bernstein, Brooks, Friedan, Mailer, David Denby traces Mailer’s transformation from a needy Jewish kid in Brooklyn to a street-tough writer who thrived on combat and iconoclasm. Mailer was transformed during his service in World War II. As Denby puts it, “This American-style prophet brawled and head-butted at parties; at one time or another, he was decked, hammered, billy clubbed, his eye gouged, his ear bitten. He believed that physical courage was necessary equipment for a great writer (Hemingway was the model) and that Jewish men in particular had to overcome all sorts of weakness.”
For Mailer, “everything he could put his body and spirit through was a test. He was sure he needed to escape the traps not only of his soft middle-class Jewish background but also the traps of postwar America—the desire for ‘security,’ the endless consumerism, and what he took to be the country’s humiliating spiritual mediocrity. He had made himself into a novelist in the Pacific, and now he brought the war home. For the author of The Naked and the Dead, the truce never arrived.” Mailer “was fascinated by boxers, murderers, and spies.”
🧵I disagree w/the NYT framing that Republicans and Democrats have equally given up on student learning
At the state level, red states are tackling student achievement; blue states are struggling b/c “equity”
Compare the recent policy decisions in red and blue states:
Natalie Riediger, Darja Barr and Anna Stokke:
As university professors and parents, we were pleased to hear that Manitoba Education has reinstated percentage reporting when assessing high school students rather than vague terms, such as “emerging.” And consequently, we were disappointed, but not surprised, to read John Wiens’ Think Tank op-ed — Grading by percentage is failing our students, May 7 — critiquing the use of percentage grades.
I think we are going to find out also that the organizations benefitting from what the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office concludes is $521,000,000,000 worth of larceny annually in the federal budget have squatters’ rights in the larceny. The theft has gone on for so long and is so institutionalized that the beneficiaries of the fraud regard it as a property right. In effect, those who have been defrauding us now have squatters’ rights in the fraud.
Two articles in the current issue of the City Journal address this serious matter. Steven Malanga brings to our attention that the federal budget funds anti-poverty, community building, social welfare, anti-crime and other such programs that never produce any results but continue to run for decades. Congress funds these programs without even requiring that criteria be established for assessing their success. It seems the money mainly goes for building political machines and the wealth of local politicians primarily for the Democrats who control the inner cities.
Heather Mac Donald exposes the facts of the National Institutes of Health’s funding of medical research. The NIH has been paying the universities where the research is conducted a cover charge equal to 69% of the grant to reimburse the universities for the cost of their infrastructure that supports the research. Universities are each receiving hundreds of million of dollars in “indirect funding” to pay for the university’s infrastructure used in the research.
But what does the cover charge really pay for? It seems it pays for the extraordinary expansion of the size and scope of the administrative bureaucracy. There seem to be endless vice presidents, assistant and vice provosts, and associate deans whose jobs are to police language, thought, speech, political correctness and provide emotional comfort to those in need.
The student organization “Sex Out Loud” was approved for almost $136,000 in allocatable funding for the 2025-2026 school year by ASM’s Student Services Finance Committee, an increase of more than $8,000 from the previous year.
Sex Out Loud’s website reports that its mission is to “promote healthy sexuality through sex-positive education and activism.” The first photo on the homepage is of a group of students holding sex toys, one of whom is simulating oral sex on a fake vulva.
Rory Madden, the chair of Sex Out Loud, denied an interview request from The Madison Federalist. However, she provided an email response to some questions. She confirmed that Sex Out Loud is “solely funded by the General Student Services Fund,” which comes from segregated fees that UW-Madison students are required to pay.
The SOL website has an order form that allows any student to request condoms, various types of lubricant, gloves, dental dams, Plan B, and pregnancy tests. Madden said the “online order form is frequently used by students, and anyone is welcome to visit our office in person to collect supplies.”
The Plan B and pregnancy tests are provided by Planned Parenthood, but SOL does not receive other “consistent supply donations.”
I see the effects on my daughter, now in her first year at a British university. She’s having a wonderful academic experience, at least when the university operates. She has just started a five-month period without any teaching, presumably because of budget cuts. I used to think that the UK’s much-vaunted undergraduate degree, supposedly three years long, was really just 18 months given the long holidays. It’s now less than that.
Bill and Christie-Lee Hansberry
‘Streaming’ is a dirty word in education, but so was ‘phonics’ once upon a time. We think that general beliefs about streaming (ability grouping) deserves a rethink. What if we consider ability grouping from a standpoint of targeted reading and spelling instruction? Does differentiation offer what it promises, or is it a poor remedy for low-quality teaching and high-variance curriculum? And, given the huge variance of basic literacy skills in most Australian classrooms, can we really teach all students reading and spelling at grade level?
I’m Streaming has a dark past. In the 1950s and 1960s, IQ testing was used to organise (stream) students into set groups who would receive different academic programs from that point on. Groups in the upper stream would have access to highly academic content, the best teachers and even the best resources. At the same time, lower-streamed students could receive the opposite, which had a devastating and compounding impact on the futures of many. Like it or not, IQ tests have incredible predictive power for academic achievement, but they should never have been used in this limiting way. Research in the 1960s and 1970s highlighted the obvious problems that resulted from IQ-based streaming. Educators became understandably wary of any deterministic practice that could lock students into an educational trajectory based on test results. The long-gone days of IQ streaming in schools casts a long shadow, causing apprehension among educators today about any form of ability grouping, and standardised testing for that matter. The Facebook feed of any educator is full of quotes hyperventilating about how ‘children aren’t test scores’. We agree, they are not.
——
Related:
Madison’s ongoing one size fits all experiments, English 10
The investor and Harvard alum on CNBC Monday criticized Harvard Corporation’s leadership, including senior fellow Penny Pritzker. “It’s time for a change in leadership in the board at Harvard,” Ackman said.
President Trump renewed his threat to revoke the school’s tax-exempt status on Friday, saying in a Truth Social post, “It’s what they deserve!” An administration official said the president’s post wasn’t a formal directive to the Internal Revenue Service to take action.
The threat prompted condemnation from Harvard President Alan Garber, who called the move “highly illegal” and “destructive to Harvard.”
“Tax exempt status is granted to educational institutions to enable them to successfully carry out their mission of education and, for research universities, of research,” Garber told The Wall Street Journal on Friday. “Obviously that would be severely impaired if we were to lose our tax exempt status.”
Ackman, who endorsed Trump’s 2024 presidential bid, has been critical of the president’s trade war.
The heat is rising on Penny Pritzker, the senior fellow on Harvard’s powerful governing board
A threat actor has contacted multiple school districts demanding payments related to student and staff data stolen in a December breach.
Through a little political laundering — sorry, consulting — firm called Swift Public Affairs (also in Portland), the Raindrop Fund funneled a whopping $45,000 into Linn United PAC, a political group that’s now championing three candidates: Stephanie Lunceford, Kris McLaughlin, and Kristopher Schendel. If you’re wondering what $45,000 buys you in a school board race, the answer is: a lot. $28,900 for Polling, Mailers, digital ads, polished messaging, and maybe even a few consultants whispering strategy tips into candidates’ ears.
But why does a Portland-based fund care about a mid-sized school district in Linn County? Here’s a hint: it’s not because they’re passionate about improving local reading scores. The Oregon Raindrop Fund has a track record of bankrolling progressive causes, from climate campaigns to ballot initiatives that align neatly with Democratic Party priorities. Their goal isn’t better math instruction; it’s ideological conquest, one school board at a time.
Let’s be blunt: this isn’t grassroots. This is AstroTurf.
Meanwhile, as the GAPS board turns into a political football field, Oregon’s academic performance is circling the drain. The state ranks 45th or worsenationally in reading and math, despite having some of the highest per-student funding in the country. It’s like setting piles of cash on fire and then blaming the smoke for the lack of oxygen.
And what’s replacing academic rigor? A parade of social justice initiatives, gender theory debates, and activism that belongs in a university seminar, not a third-grade classroom. Parents looking for accountability and reading proficiency are getting lectures about pronouns instead.
The School of Education won’t be accepting applications for a third cohort in 2026, Wilkerson said.
“We were essentially being incentivized by the federal government to try these partnerships out, and the idea that if you build a partnership and you have some investment on the front end, that it might be able to be sustained in the future,” Wilkerson said. “The part that feels wasteful to me is we’re working, we’re getting it up and going, and then to have the support withdrawn feels just unnecessarily disruptive.”
——
Redistributed federal taxpayer funds and University Governance
The original purpose of the university was simple: the academic formation of its students. Over the past several decades, however, society’s perception of higher-education institutions has grown to encompass numerous aspects of student development, including career preparation. A similar shift has occurred on a smaller scale where the role of professors is concerned. Though their main responsibility is to guide students’ academic growth, professors are increasingly expected to fill the role of career mentor. Surveys conducted by Inside Higher Edhave found that a significant percentage of students and faculty believe that mentorship is a role that professors ought to fill. Given their background and position as academics, are professors equipped to offer such guidance to students?
A 2024 Student Voice survey conducted by Inside Higher Ed and Generation Lab found that 55 percent of students think that professors are “at least partly responsible” for acting as mentors. This number increases to 57 percent when limited to students aged 18-24 and to 67 percent when limited to students attending private, nonprofit institutions. Administrators and student-success professionals seem similarly compelled by the idea, with 51 percent of “student-success professionals” and 65 percent of administrators at private, nonprofit schools agreeing that professors share at least some responsibility for mentorship.
Madison Education Partnership:
When we dig deeper on summative and formative exams, we find extreme inequities in performance by student demographic group and in specific content areas. For example, in 6th grade, the typical student from a low-income family is two or more grade levels behind in algebra and in numbers and operations while the typical student not from a low-income family is at the lower end of on grade level. The typical student who identifies as White in MMSD scores at or above grade level in 6 th grade, compared to only four in one hundred students who identify as Black and ten in one hundred students who identify as Latinx.
While MMSD trends are similar to those of other districts in the state, we still believe MMSD can raise growth and achievement in middle school math and recognize that MMSD has taken steps in that direction. The District implemented standards-aligned curriculum with supporting assessments; professional learning for educators and instructional coaches; K-5 implementation learning walks focused on identifying implementation of core resources and high-leverage instructional practices; and continued acceleration of learning opportunities in middle school grades. While the pandemic exacerbated inequities in mathematics achievement, the low levels of achievement, and declines in achievement, precede the pandemic. District leaders have taken steps to accelerate growth, including partnering with MEP and UW-Madison to implement a high-quality middle school tutoring;aligning middle school math course sequences across schools; and convening a math advisory committee driven by school-based and central office staff to set a vision for strong math instruction, identify levers for change and enact promising practices to raise achievement.
———-
How One Woman Rewrote Math in Corvallis
Singapore Math
Discovery Math
This explains two related phenomena, both much deplored by feminists, who are in the business of ignoring human instinct.
The first is male flight: the tendency of male involvement in a given profession, occupation, institution, or industry to drop precipitously once a certain threshold of female involvement is surpassed.
The second is the low value assigned to women’s work.
Occupations seen as a predominantly masculine are almost invariably perceived – by both men and women – as conferring a certain intrinsic status, whether high or low. Garbagemen, oil rig roughnecks, firemen, special forces operators, and private equity sharks are all male-dominated occupations, and each occupies a distinct plane of social status. Conversely, social status being a primary attribute of male sexual allure, a profession in which women predominate is unable to confer status, by definition. To say that female professions are ‘low status’ is a category error; they’re simply outside of the status hierarchy. A kindergarten teacher is not really of higher or lower status than a plumber or a stock broker, because neither the plumber nor the stock broker will care very much about what she does before asking her out on a date; the kindergarten teacher, however, will care a great deal about which man is a plumber, and which a stock broker.
The preceding paragraph implicitly assumed a female kindergarten teacher. There are, of course, a very small number of male kindergarten teachers, may Thor have mercy on their souls. Men who work in occupations perceived as predominantly female pay a steep sexual penalty. Their lifetime odds of marriage decline as compared to men who work in sexually neutral or male-dominated professions; a woman’s success in marriage is wholly unaffected by working in a male-dominant field. This is intuitively obvious, but I was able to dig up a study that apparently quantified this.
The flood of women into the workforce over the last several generations has led to several professions switching from male-dominated to female-dominated – for example, high school teachers, nurses, and veterinarians were all, almost within living memory, masculine vocations. After becoming feminine occupations, in every single case, those professions immediately plummeted in status. Men who entered them came to be thought of us somehow defective; what else is one to conclude about a man who chooses to compete with women, rather than with his peers? This is certainly not always fair. There is nothing necessarily defective about being a male high school teacher. All of my favourite teachers in high school were men. I have friends who work as high school teachers, whom I respect greatly, not least because someone has to be there to set a good example for our lost and abandoned boys; on that note, if you have not yet read this excellent piece from the Librarian of Celaeno, I implore you to do so, for it is thematically relevant to the topic at hand:
I would basically summarize my approach to all practical money matters as some combination of hope and avoidance. I think I learned what a 529 savings plan was when my daughter went to college and I realized that I didn’t have one.
When I was growing up in a house full of books, my otherwise fantastic mother somehow conveyed the message that it was vulgar to talk or even really think about money. My mother cared more about a good sentence than anything you could buy. If something broke in our house with two dogs, two cats and five children, she would say, “It’s just a material object.”
Because of all this, I somehow missed the life lesson that in order to not think about money you have to have enough of it. Sometimes I worry about passing along these extraordinarily unhelpful attitudes to my own children. I worry that they are in the air in my household.
When I see a spreadsheet of any kind my mind blurs; the numbers dance uncooperatively on the page. On some deep, shameful, utterly irrational level, I think it is because I have been conditioned to think: Where is the man who will explain this to me? That was another one of my mother’s ideas—that there are certain aspects of life that men should take care of. I don’t know why I haven’t been able to transcend this with all the thinking I have done on sexual politics, but it is harder than it seems to tune out subliminal messages from your childhood.
District Director of Early Learning Culleen Witthuhn pointed to a number of reasons for why it saw the increase last year but not in the first two school years the district offered full-day 4K at some sites.
———
Madison Education Partnership:
“professional development and evidence-based curricula in 4K Literacy” – Recommendations for the Madison School District.
———
The taxpayer funded Madison School District long used Reading Recovery…
The data clearly indicate that being able to read is not a requirement for graduation at (Madison) East, especially if you are black or Hispanic”
My Question to Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers on Teacher Mulligans and our Disastrous Reading Results
2017: West High Reading Interventionist Teacher’s Remarks to the School Board on Madison’s Disastrous Reading Results
Madison’s taxpayer supported K-12 school district, despite spending far more than most, has long tolerated disastrous reading results.
“An emphasis on adult employment”
Wisconsin Public Policy Forum Madison School District Report[PDF]
WEAC: $1.57 million for Four Wisconsin Senators
Friday Afternoon Veto: Governor Evers Rejects AB446/SB454; an effort to address our long term, disastrous reading results
Booked, but can’t read (Madison): functional literacy, National citizenship and the new face of Dred Scott in the age of mass incarceration.
When A Stands for Average: Students at the UW-Madison School of Education Receive Sky-High Grades. How Smart is That?
A principal-turned-consultant has built a movement—and a business—on overturning how teachers have graded for generations. His alternative: “grading for equity.”
Joe Feldman preaches that students should be able to retake tests and redo assignments. There should be no penalties for late work and no grades for homework. No points for good behavior, classroom participation or perfect attendance, either.
“When you include those in a grade, you’re bringing your implicit bias into the grade because not all students learn in that particular way,” Feldman told dozens of teachers gathered for a training session in Schenectady, N.Y., one Wednesday afternoon in March. Students should be graded only on their demonstrated learning of class material, Feldman said.
America’s grading system has been largely stable for decades, but Feldman has managed to shift many schools’ practices in just a few years. And despite the broader Trump-led swell against anything with the word “equity” in it, Feldman continues to evangelize his approach—and some school leaders keep listening.
Schenectady City School District superintendent Carlos Cotto, whose district paid Feldman’s consulting firm $65,000 to train hundreds of teachers in March, isn’t deterred by the equity backlash. “It’s part of the work when you think of education,” he said.
Grading for equity hasn’t escaped political criticism, though. Connecticut legislators, for instance, have questioned a policy in some districts to set minimum grades for assignments at 50 rather than zero, a common feature of equitable grading. Some schools nationwide instituted the practice only to roll back parts of it.
Teachers give Feldman’s ideas mixed reviews. In Schenectady, some scrolled on their phones during his presentation, while others complained they weren’t sure his approach was practical. It remains unclear whether this form of grading is more effective or even more equitable than the traditional way.
Notes on ungrading.
Madison’s grading schemes over the years are worth a look as well.
and, via Chris Rickert:
It’s also laid bare what could be an inequity in the new guaranteed-admission regime because most Dane County public high schools also don’t weigh their grades for difficulty — meaning that, in theory, students who get straight A’s in all regular-level classes could have a better chance at getting in to UW than students who take more challenging honors and advanced placement classes but also have a few B’s sprinkled in with their A’s.
Handwriting bias in human Comparative Judgement
Handwriting bias in traditional human marking
Back in 2018, the English exam regulator Ofqual published a fascinating study looking at the thinking processes of experienced examiners in English Language GCSE. Here are some of the comments the examiners made about the scripts they were marking.
I see football, I see band 4, straightaway.
If you read none of these words, and you see they’ve done two-and-a-half sides, it’s written in paragraphs, the handwriting’s readable. And a candidate who gets 5 out of 8 for question one looks like that often.
— There’s a lot going on there. Doesn’t like to stretch himself too much, this is definitely a boy.
— You’re right it is a boy.
— Scruffy writing, can’t be bothered writing too much
So yes, handwriting bias exists, even amongst experienced examiners!
This is a misalignment problem. The economic signal (the diploma) still circulates as if the underlying work has occurred. But the work isn’t there. We’ve just shifted the friction offscreen, and have outsourced it to a chatbot and let the system pretend nothing’s changed. So at this moment, we are credentialing fluency with tools that do the thinking for you.
And yes, cheating has always existed. But this isn’t traditional cheating. It’s ambient, platform-approved, investor-funded cognitive offloading.
And to be abundantly clear, this isn’t the fault of the students – in a winner-takes-all economy, it must be extraordinarily difficult to resist the allure of something like an AI homework machine. But there are questions like: if AI can do the work for you, what exactly are we measuring? What do you do with the free time… scroll TikTok (that answer seems to be yes). And what happens to the labor market when a four-year degree signals nothing about what a person can actually do?
…….
We are seeing this happen in pockets. Take a look at what Mississippi has accomplished with education – it has the fastest improving school system in the entire country. These are minor currents against the major flow of capital and attention.
But they suggest an alternative to both digital frictionlessness and physical collapse – a world where effort is neither eliminated nor wasted, but directed toward systems that actually sustain us. Maybe it’s things like requiring tech platforms to internalize costs they currently externalize to physical systems and human attention (challenging) or educational models that reward deep engagement rather than interface management (also challenging). But we have to acknowledge that when we remove friction from one domain, we’re not eliminating it, we’re just moving it somewhere new.
For decades, American schools relied on reading programs influenced by educators Marie Clay and Lucy Calkins. Clay’s Reading Recovery program encouraged children to use pictures, context, and guessing strategies, known as three-cueing, rather than decoding words through phonics. Similarly, Calkins emphasized the idea that reading is a natural process that develops through exposure to books rather than through systematic instruction in phonics.
However, extensive research in cognitive science and literacy development has shown that phonics is a critical component of effective reading instruction. Despite this evidence, programs based on Clay’s and Calkins’ ideas became widespread. In response, many school districts and states as a whole are shifting toward phonics-based instruction aligned with the “science of reading,” a body of research supporting evidence-based literacy practices.
A similar debate is now emerging in math education. Jo Boaler, a Stanford University professor and researcher, has promoted a reform-based approach to teaching math focused on conceptual understanding and growth mindset. While some educators support her philosophy, others have raised concerns about its effectiveness and the lack of empirical support for certain aspects of her methods. Nonetheless, some districts, including Corvallis, have adopted her approach. This has led to ongoing discussion about the best strategies for improving student outcomes in mathematics.
Jo Boaler
Jo Boaler is a prominent figure in the field of mathematics education, often associated with the “whole-child” approach to learning math. While she did not originate this philosophy, she has become one of its most visible advocates. Similar to how Lucy Calkins became a leading voice for a particular style of reading instruction, Boaler has used her position at Stanford University to promote her educational theories, particularly through her organization, YouCubed.
YouCubed is a Stanford-affiliated initiative that provides math teaching resources rooted in Boaler’s philosophy. Many school districts that adopt YouCubed materials are aligning with her approach to math education, much like those that implemented Lucy Calkins’ “Units of Study” for reading.
Aaron Snoswell, Kevin Witzenberger and Rayane el Masri:
The case of vegetative electron microscopy offers a troubling glimpse into how AI systems can perpetuate and amplify errors throughout our collective knowledge.
“Vegetative electron microscopy” appears to have originated through a remarkable coincidence of unrelated errors. First, two papers from the 1950s, published in the journal Bacteriological Reviews, were scanned and digitised. However, the digitising process erroneously combined “vegetative” from one column of text with “electron” from another. As a result, the phantom term was created.
Decades later, “vegetative electron microscopy” turned up in some Iranian scientific papers. In 2017 and 2019, two papers used the term in English captions and abstracts.
A final point here is that up until now, I’ve been acting as if government can foresee the ultimate consequences of its actions. We usually don’t have enough data to forecast the impacts of complex economic regulations on different groups of people. Is raising the minimum wage worthwhile given the number of jobs that will never be created? Who exactly gets hardest hit by prohibiting Uber and making taxis more expensive? You could tell different stories, but the advantage of direct redistribution is that it requires a lot fewer assumptions. Find out who is rich, find out who is poor, and you’re basically done. That’s not a completely trivial task, but it’s a lot easier and simpler to do than making complex predictions about how millions of people will behave in response to any particular intervention in the economy.
History backs up the idea that redistribution is better than trying to micromanage millions of individual decisions. The Nordic social democracies are wealthy, while countries like Venezuela, Argentina, and those in the former Eastern bloc have sought to more directly manage the economy. Sweden, Norway, Finland, and Denmark actually do quite well in indexes of economic freedom because even though they tax and spend a lot, they to a large extent otherwise leave the economy alone. I tend to think it’s pretty absurd to put these countries ahead of the US in terms of economic freedom, as these rankings often do, and I’ll get to that in the next essay, but it’s unquestionably true that Nordic countries today don’t have many of the kinds of leftist economic policies we often see in the third world. If you look at the worst performing countries since the 1950s, it’s basically a list of nations that have had civil wars plus Argentina and Venezuela.
——
more on Act 10.
What happened to learning as a national priority?
For decades, both Republicans and Democrats strove to be seen as champions of student achievement. Politicians believed pushing for stronger reading and math skills wasn’t just a responsibility, it was potentially a winning electoral strategy.
At the moment, though, it seems as though neither party, nor even a single major political figure, is vying to claim that mantle.
……
All of this is true despite the fact that reading scores are the lowest they have been in decades, after a pandemic that devastated children by shuttering their schools and sending them deeper and deeper into the realm of screens and social media. And it is no wonder Americans are increasingly cynical about higher education. Forty percent of students who start college do not graduate, often leaving with debt and few concrete skills.
“Right now, there are no education goals for the country,” said Arne Duncan, who served as President Barack Obama’s first secretary of education after running Chicago’s public school system. “There are no metrics to measure goals, there are no strategies to achieve those goals and there is no public transparency.”
——-
But despite the lack of national direction, an energetic group of educators, parents and researchers is advancing an ambitious agenda for learning. It is centered around one big idea: The breadth, depth and quality of the curriculum matter.
——
The taxpayer funded Madison School District long used Reading Recovery…
The data clearly indicate that being able to read is not a requirement for graduation at (Madison) East, especially if you are black or Hispanic”
My Question to Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers on Teacher Mulligans and our Disastrous Reading Results
2017: West High Reading Interventionist Teacher’s Remarks to the School Board on Madison’s Disastrous Reading Results
Madison’s taxpayer supported K-12 school district, despite spending far more than most, has long tolerated disastrous reading results.
“An emphasis on adult employment”
Wisconsin Public Policy Forum Madison School District Report[PDF]
WEAC: $1.57 million for Four Wisconsin Senators
Friday Afternoon Veto: Governor Evers Rejects AB446/SB454; an effort to address our long term, disastrous reading results
Booked, but can’t read (Madison): functional literacy, National citizenship and the new face of Dred Scott in the age of mass incarceration.
When A Stands for Average: Students at the UW-Madison School of Education Receive Sky-High Grades. How Smart is That?
You would not know it based on media coverage of a small number of highly rejective colleges that enroll a tiny portion of all undergraduates, but most college students in the United States attend a public college or university that admits most or all applicants. These six charts reveal a much different picture of undergraduate education in the United States in 2023 (the most recent year for which data is available).
1. 76% of undergraduates attended a public institution of higher education, according to the Department of Education’s Integrated Postsecondary Education Data Survey (IPEDS).
Student loans have also become one of the great policy failures of the age. Even before the pandemic, fewer than half of borrowers were paying down their debt. The federal student loan balance sheet has ballooned to $1.7 trillion, double what it was 15 years ago when Democrats used ObamaCare to nationalize the industry. Student debt would now exceed $2 trillion without the Biden loan forgiveness.
Enter House Republicans, who this week advanced a slate of reforms in the Education and Workforce Committee that they plan to attach to reconciliation. The goal is to hold colleges accountable for student outcomes and curb the open-ended loan buffet.
The House would reduce the aggregate limit for undergraduate loans to $50,000 from $57,500. The bill would also impose a $100,000 borrowing limit for master’s degree and doctoral programs and $150,000 for professional programs like law degrees. Graduate student loans are currently uncapped.
This will reduce the incentive for colleges to raise tuition and add graduate programs, which often cost six figures. The legislation also limits student borrowing to the “median cost of college” for programs nationwide, which will effectively compel high-priced institutions to lower tuition or provide more financial aid.
On Wednesday, the Illinois Institute of Technology announced it had reached an agreement with India’s University Grants Commission to establish a branch campus in Mumbai, opening to students in fall 2026. It will be the first degree-granting U.S. institution on Indian soil and Illinois Tech’s first international branch campus.
For decades, a complicated legal and tax system prevented U.S. institutions from opening campuses in India. Then, in 2020, the Indian government issued a new National Education Policy paving the way, officials promised, for a much easier pathway to fruitful academic partnerships.
India is a major growth market for U.S. higher education; this year the country surpassed China for the first time as the top origin country for international students in the U.S. Establishing a beachhead in India could help institutions carve out a dominant space for themselves in the lucrative international recruitment market, especially since the vast majority of Indian international students come to the U.S. for postgraduate study.
Some of the disengaged students in Pugh’s courses are what administrators and cybersecurity experts say are “ghost students,” and they’ve been a growing problem for community colleges, particularly since the shift to online instruction during the pandemic. These “ghost students” are artificially intelligent agents or bots that pose as real students in order to steal millions of dollars of financial aid that could otherwise go to actual humans. And as colleges grapple with the problem, Pugh and her colleagues have been tasked with a new and “frustrating” task of weeding out these bots and trying to decide who’s a real person.
The process, she said, takes her focus off teaching the real students.
“I am very intentional about having individualized interaction with all of my students as early as possible,” Pugh said. “That included making phone calls to people, sending email messages, just a lot of reaching out individually to find out ‘Are you just overwhelmed at work and haven’t gotten around to starting the class yet? Or are you not a real person?’”