Taxpayer Funded Wisconsin DPI finalizes Lowers K-12 ‘cut scores,’ even as criticism continues

Cleo Krejci

Jill Underly, the top DPI official, finalized those changes Sept. 3. They will be applied to 2024-25 state report card data, which will be released in November.

“Just as you wouldn’t rely on a decade-old GPS to find your way today, we can’t use outdated performance benchmarks to guide school improvement,” Underly said in an Aug. 15 statement. “Students are learning in new, dynamic ways, and accountability systems must keep pace. Innovation in education means we transform how we measure success.”

Criticisms have continued past spring legislative session

As DPI finalizes changes from this summer, it continues to face criticism that it’s made three changes to cut scores since 2020.

Last spring, Republican lawmakers introduced a bill that would have forced DPI to revert Forward Exam cut scores to those in place in 2019-20. After the measure passed along party lines, Gov. Tony Evers ultimately vetoed the bill in March, saying that although he’s been critical of DPI’s approach, he took issue with lawmakers’ attempts to “undermine” the state agency’s independence and authority.

Among the most vocal critics to the changes is the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, a law firm often aligned with conservative politics. It has released several statements, and analyses, that are critical of DPI.

This fall, a group of school board officials and current or former superintendents is trying a new approach: getting school boards to pass resolutions saying report card changes “make it impossible to meaningfully compare data from year to year.”

“Frequent and arbitrary changes are not only making it impossible for school leaders to understand and track school performance, the changes themselves are doing a disservice to students by cloaking lackluster academic performance data with other metrics,” reads a statement from the Wisconsin School Leaders for Excellence, which formed in January.

———

Madison taxpayers have long supported far above average (now > $25,000 per student) K-12 tax & spending practices. This, despite long term, disastrous reading results. 

Madison Schools: More $, No Accountability

The taxpayer funded Madison School District long used Reading Recovery

The data clearly indicate that being able to read is not a requirement for graduation at (Madison) East, especially if you are black or Hispanic”

My Question to Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers on Teacher Mulligans and our Disastrous Reading Results

2017: West High Reading Interventionist Teacher’s Remarks to the School Board on Madison’s Disastrous Reading Results 

Madison’s taxpayer supported K-12 school district, despite spending far more than most, has long tolerated disastrous reading results.

“An emphasis on adult employment”

Wisconsin Public Policy Forum Madison School District Report[PDF]

WEAC: $1.57 million for Four Wisconsin Senators

Friday Afternoon Veto: Governor Evers Rejects AB446/SB454; an effort to address our long term, disastrous reading results

Booked, but can’t read (Madison): functional literacy, National citizenship and the new face of Dred Scott in the age of mass incarceration.

When A Stands for Average: Students at the UW-Madison School of Education Receive Sky-High Grades. How Smart is That?


Fast Lane Literacy by sedso