Where would I be without the Madison School Board?
Every month or so they provide me with fodder for this blog. Why, just last week the district touted a new logo for which they paid an out-of-state design company $100,000, only months after the voters gave them another $600 million in taxing authority to spend, we thought, on actual education.
The Board provides me with so much material that I really should pay them. But then again I don’t need to as they’re poised to double their own salaries and give themselves taxpayer financed health insurance.
The Board will soon vote to make official a pay increase from $8,000 to $15,000. The Board president will get more and they’ll also get stipends to attend meetings that one would think are part of the job and should be covered by their salary. And then there’s the health insurance that will cost taxpayers about $200,000 a year if all seven board members take it.
According to a story in the Wisconsin State Journal, Board member Savion Castro summed up the reasons when he stated that most school boards are structured for “older, whiter, wealthier folks,” but that’s not an accurate reflection of the Madison district’s diverse student body, and increasing pay could make board positions “more accessible to the folks that look like the students and the families of the district.”
But, wait a minute. Four of the current board’s seven members are people of color, and two identify as having disabilities. There are no white men on the Board and nobody is wealthy. And in fact, one of the most dedicated, impactful board members in recent decades was Mary Burke, who committed the unpardonable sins of being both white and wealthy.
And while I’m on the topic, the philosophy behind Catro’s remark is pretty dangerous. Because he’s saying we should discourage public service based on race and income. In principle that’s what Jim Crow was.
….
And as for diversity, the real diversity we lack on this Board is diversity of opinion. There’s not a single member of this group that cares about taxpayers, good order in the schools, test scores or the fact that Madison is losing students to other districts and charter schools. Instead, all seven members of the Board are, like Castro, obsessed with identity politics.
——
Madison taxpayers have long supported far above average (now > $25,000 per student) K-12 tax & spending practices. This, despite long term, disastrous reading results.
Madison Schools: More $, No Accountability
The taxpayer funded Madison School District long used Reading Recovery…
The data clearly indicate that being able to read is not a requirement for graduation at (Madison) East, especially if you are black or Hispanic”
My Question to Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers on Teacher Mulligans and our Disastrous Reading Results
2017: West High Reading Interventionist Teacher’s Remarks to the School Board on Madison’s Disastrous Reading Results
Madison’s taxpayer supported K-12 school district, despite spending far more than most, has long tolerated disastrous reading results.
“An emphasis on adult employment”
Wisconsin Public Policy Forum Madison School District Report[PDF]
WEAC: $1.57 million for Four Wisconsin Senators
Friday Afternoon Veto: Governor Evers Rejects AB446/SB454; an effort to address our long term, disastrous reading results
Booked, but can’t read (Madison): functional literacy, National citizenship and the new face of Dred Scott in the age of mass incarceration.
When A Stands for Average: Students at the UW-Madison School of Education Receive Sky-High Grades. How Smart is That?