Notes on the EJM doxxing

Tyler Cowen:

The only summary I have seen is from Karlstack, noting that he is siding against the doxxers and has defended EJMR in the past.  Most of the people who care already know the details, so I won’t repeat them.  I will however add a few observations:

1. I don’t read EJMR, so however bad it is, or however useful it sometimes may be, is a closed book to me.  It is not the next marginal thing I might read if I had more time.  And I have never posted there.  So my comments should not be taken as reflecting any deep knowledge of the site itself.  I would rather listen to Wings songs, if that is what it came down to.

2. The soon to be published paper supposedly reveals IP addresses of many EJMR posters.  This seems wrong to me, noting that many posters (presumably) are making entirely innocent observations, or if not innocent remarks nonetheless remarks that should not be doxxed.  They may wish to criticize a colleague or superior, or express a repugnant political opinion.  Or whatever.

2b. What about posters from Turkey, China, Russia and elsewhere, who have expressed political opinions? Isn’t this point enough on its own to settle the matter?