This 2009 (!) University of Wisconsin-Madison Placement Office study of “reform vs traditional math” outcomes came to mind when reading Corrinne Hess’s 7 July 2026 article: “Fewer than half of Wisconsin students are proficient at math“.
I “prompted” grok, gemini and Claude for summaries of this report.
Grok’s intro plug:
(The study) compares traditional sequences with reform programs (such as Core-Plus) using data from over 17,000 students and a real Wisconsin high school that switched curricula. The summary includes clear data tables, placement outcomes, and practical implications for parents and educators.Beautifully designed, fully responsive, and easy to read on any device.
Claude’s intro plug:
“A University of Wisconsin study of over 17,000 incoming students found that students from traditional high school math sequences placed into more advanced college math courses than students from reform curricula like Core-Plus, even after controlling for whether they’d taken calculus. Taking calculus in high school — regardless of curriculum — was linked to the single biggest jump in placement scores. Encouragingly, the placement test itself showed no meaningful bias between curriculum types. Read the full study and a 10-year case study of one district’s curriculum transition: [link]”
Gemini’s intro plug:
How does your high school’s math track affect college success? A UW Center for Placement Testing study shows Traditional tracks outperform Reform tracks by 7-8% on college exams, nearly doubling top calculus placements. Yet, the placement test itself is proven completely unbiased. Read the full math readiness report here: [Insert Your Link]
—–
21% of University of Wisconsin System Freshman Require Remedial Math
How One Woman Rewrote Math in Corvallis
Singapore Math
Discovery Math
Math Forum 2007