K-12 Tax & Spending Climate: More on the Battle Between Public Sector Compensation/Benefits and Tax Increases

David Warren:

Yet when we speak of “entitlements,” or more precisely, against them, the first thing we face is public sector entitlements — in Canada as in every other western or quasi-western country. The troubles the Greeks are now experiencing with their civil service, which is in a position to bring the country to a halt, is a warning for the road ahead.
And forget Greece, look at California. There one may see in clear North American daylight what a vast unspeakable public bankruptcy looks like. It was not an inevitable thing. Gentle reader need only compare, candidly, California with Texas — which is flourishing, and whose voters know why. Economic decline is a choice, not a fate, and it has everything to do with big, intrusive government.
Said reader and I could argue till death about the numbers, playing selectively with the statistics; yet what is obvious remains obvious. Among the games at which I am most inclined to sneer, is the percentage of almost any published budget that is assigned to “administrative costs” — in departments that are essentially all administration.

One thought on “K-12 Tax & Spending Climate: More on the Battle Between Public Sector Compensation/Benefits and Tax Increases”

  1. It is important to look at all entitlements as no one is truly “entitled”. We are on the verge of a collapse if we don’t take into account ALL the little things as a whole that make up the complete picture. In doing so, in practice, we can find fat in a budget that can be trimmed and should be trimmed until we can truly afford to BE entitled. Now is not the time.

Comments are closed.