In Politics of School Reform, Transparency Doesn’t Equal Accountability

Andrew Rotherham:

Transparency is powerful and President Obama has rightly made it a pillar of his administration’s approach to policymaking. But transparency also offers the seductive promise of an easy way out for policymakers. It can trap proponents of various policy proposals in an intellectual cul de sac because it becomes easy to see information as sufficient to drive reform rather than just as a predicate for change. The risk is especially potent when proponents are convinced of the obviousness of the changes they seek.
We’ve seen this repeatedly with federal education policy. The Bush administration assumed the federal No Child Left Behind law would produce a tidal wave of student and school performance data that would swamp opposition to school improvement efforts. Seven years later the political resistance to education reform is as potent as ever and former Bush aides now acknowledge placing too much faith in the power of information.
In 1997, Congress tried unsuccessfully to increase accountability for colleges of education and teacher training programs by requiring them to report more data about outcomes. “Congress asked colleges of education to take stock of quality issues, but instead the colleges mostly whitewashed the problem,” says Ross Weiner, a senior adviser at The Education Trust. No Child Left Behind also required states and school districts to issue better report cards about educational performance. There, too, evasion rather than aggressive efforts are the norm.

One thought on “In Politics of School Reform, Transparency Doesn’t Equal Accountability”

  1. Thank you for posting this piece – indeed, it’s easy to lose sight of the fact that information is a necessary, but not sufficient, condition for making improvements. It’s all the more troubling when shortfalls in gathering and analyzing complete and reliable data mean you can’t even get to that first, inadequate step.

Comments are closed.