As adolescents and young adults head into another weekend of (for many) driving too fast, drinking too much, smoking and doing their all to perpetuate the species, at least we know why they engage in self-destructive risk-taking. Adolescents feel invulnerable (“Me, get hurt? No way.”) and drastically underestimate risks (“Come on, what are the chances of getting pregnant the first time — 100 to 1?”).
Except that they don’t.
For 40 years both popular and scholarly wisdom have held that the reason adolescents court risk is twofold: They believe danger bounces off them and they low-ball the chances that it will bring harmful consequences. They have weighed the risk (low), taken stock of their resilience or skill or smarts (excellent) and made the “rational” decision to drag-race down Main Street while inebriated. This explanation implies that when teens do stupid things, it is for rational reasons.
There is a problem with this explanation. “Adolescents don’t tend to underestimate the probability of major risks, nor [do they generally have] feelings of invulnerability,” argues Keith Stanovich of the University of Toronto in the new issue of Psychological Science in the Public Interest.