SFUSD just agreed to raises it publicly said it couldn’t afford.

Boom:

๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐— ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ต

The district is running a $๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿฎ๐—  ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐˜, under state oversight, and cut $114M last year. Another round of cuts hits by June. Their own budget page warns that funding raises with one-time dollars “would destabilize the District and result in worse outcomes for both students and educators.”

So naturally they did it.

๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ “๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ” ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—œ๐˜€๐—ป’๐˜

The union pointed to a $๐Ÿฐ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿต๐—  “๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ” as proof the district can pay. That number is fund balance, not reserves. Half of it is restricted funds locked to specific federal and local programs. The rest is one-time money already earmarked to plug the structural deficit and prevent layoffs. Once it’s spent, it’s gone. The actual reserves? $๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฏ๐Ÿต๐— , well below the state-recommended 17%. Using one-time dollars for permanent raises is buying a house because you have a down payment with no idea how to cover the mortgage.


Fast Lane Literacy by sedso