Civics: Lawfare, the Ivy League, UVA law vs Denver
What predicts Colorado Supreme Court justices’ vote on Trump disqualification? Not party—all are Democratic appointees—but law school. All Ivy League grads voted to disqualify. All Denver Law grads voted not to disqualify. pic.twitter.com/AokZMOf2bm
— Jason Willick (@jawillick) December 20, 2023
The problem with elite universities goes so much deeper than denying Jewish and white students safetyism. The Ivies represent the elite’s belief that they should have absolute rule over the masses, who they have just endless contempt for. And that’s how Trump was banned in CO: https://t.co/k1pOrtBFfq
— Batya Ungar-Sargon (@bungarsargon) December 20, 2023
1/ One thing we’ve gotten with several years of Lawfare v Trump is a bunch of civics lessons on obscure constitutional issues. This is one. It makes sense that if a foreigner or underage or fictional person tries to get on the presidential ballot, a State can say no. But … pic.twitter.com/n0HpqZqvTP
— FoiaFan🇮🇱 (@15poundstogo) December 20, 2023
The most compelling and – in my view – correct decision was the dissent from Justice Samour.
Justice Samour reached holdings that none of the other four groups did.
He examined the issues with the depth and close examination of the case law that is most like how SCOTUS does…
— Jarvis (@jarvis_best) December 20, 2023
