You can’t miss my son Jonah, 24. He’s the one spinning while blasting “Sesame Street” songs from his iPad in the back corner of Costco. The one popping up from a table at Five Guys, splashed with so much ketchup he looks like a murder victim. The one pounding on his head in agitation, sometimes for obvious reasons (he was directed to the pink waterslide instead of the blue one) and sometimes for seemingly no reason at all.
Jonah is incapable of passing through the world unnoticed — except, somehow, by policymakers and certain neurodiversity activists, who seem intent on denying that people with his level of disability exist and require extensive accommodation and care.
Take, for instance, the Labor Department, which announced in late September that it plans a “comprehensive review” of Section 14(c) of the Fair Labor Standards Act, which allows some vocational programs to pay some adults — overwhelmingly people with significant cognitive impairments — a subminimum wage based on standardized assessments of their productivity.
These programs offer job training for intellectually disabled adults interested in pursuing competitive minimum-wage jobs, as well as long-term opportunities for those whose impairments preclude conventional employment but who benefit from the structure, dignity and satisfaction of work.
That, however, is not how critics describe 14(c) settings, which for years have been targeted by disability rights activists perpetuating an image of evil capitalists getting rich off the sweat of impoverished, disabled workers. To date, 16 states have eliminated this subminimum-wage model.