The Secular Faith: The results of our obsession with fairness are comical, as when schools legislate equal valentine outcomes for students every Feb. 14.

Meghan Clyne:

If the U.S. Treasury received a dollar every time President Obama demanded that the rich pay their "fair share" to eliminate our deficits, the problem might take care of itself. After incessant use on the campaign trail, the line is again getting a workout in negotiations over the fiscal cliff. It is a surefire rhetorical tactic: Who could possibly argue against fairness?

Stephen Asma is willing to try. Contemporary society, he argues in "Against Fairness," is obsessed with fairness, which he takes to mean a universal egalitarianism and its attendant ideologies and practices, including meritocracy, redistribution and utilitarian ethics. Our "hunger for equality" prohibits favoritism, Mr. Asma says, but this great leveling also razes the virtues that arise from favoritism--duty, honor, loyalty, compassion--leaving us with a shallow notion of the good.

Mr. Asma's breezy book reads as a series of episodic reflections on the fairness question, each from a different perspective--scientific, anthropological, cultural and political. The author, a philosophy professor at Columbia College in Chicago, believes that we should ditch our fairness-based morality in favor of an ethics based on "tribes," which he defines as any "us in a milieu of thems," the most obvious bonds being those of blood and friendship. Mr. Asma thus cheerfully defends nepotism, preferential hiring and patronage politics, our resistance to which, he says, "encourages the civic success of a whole population of detached, expedient eunuchs."

Posted by Jim Zellmer at January 5, 2013 4:40 AM
Subscribe to this site via RSS/Atom: Newsletter signup | Send us your ideas