Debating Early College and AP Tests

Kevin CareyL

When the producers at Fox & Friends asked me to get up early on Saturday morning to debate the merits of students earning college credits in high school, my third thought (after "Am I being set up as the liberal stooge?" and "Will this get me on The Daily Show?") was, "Who could be against that?" The president of Belmont University, as it turns out. Here's the clip.

While our education system is structured to move people along in age cohorts, some people obviously learn much faster than others. Falling behind is a problem, but so is falling ahead and getting stuck in boring classes that you don't need. As I note, we've been running AP and IB programs in for decades now-I took seven AP tests as a high school student in the mid-80s. Curiously, the object lessons of this experience often seem lost in the broader education debate. People are constantly denouncing multiple-choice "fill in the bubble" standardized tests as horribly inadequate and a tool of corporatist oppression, yet well-off progressive parents scramble to enroll their children in high schools with a full slate of AP courses. "Teaching to test" is also a horrible sin, unless, apparently, the test is AP Physics and you're angling for the Ivy League.

Posted by Jim Zellmer at August 9, 2011 3:16 AM
Subscribe to this site via RSS/Atom: Newsletter signup | Send us your ideas