![]() |
|
| Newsletter signup | Send us your ideas
January 12, 20104K Inches Forward in Madison, Seeks FundingListen to the Madison School Board Discussion via this 32MB mp3 audio file (and via a kind reader's email). Financing this initiative remains unsettled. I recommend getting out of the curriculum creation business via the elimination of Teaching & Learning and using those proceeds to begin 4K - assuming the community and Board are convinced that it will be effective and can be managed successfully by the Administration. I would also like to see the Administration's much discussed "program/curricular review" implemented prior to adding 4K. Finally, I think it is likely that redistributed state tax programs to K-12 will decrease, given the State's spending growth and deficit problems. The financial crunch is an opportunity to rethink spending and determine where the dollars are best used for our children. I recommend a reduction in money spent for "adults to talk with other adults". Board member Beth Moss proposed that 4K begin in 2010. This motion was supported by Marj Passman and Ed Hughes (Ed's spouse, Ann Brickson is on the Board of the Goodman Center, a possible 4K partner). Maya Cole, Lucy Mathiak and Arlene Silveira voted no on a 2010 start. The Board then voted 5-1 (with Ed Hughes voting no) for a 2011 launch pending further discussions on paying for it. Retiring Board member Johnny Winston, Jr. was absent. I appreciate the thoughtful discussion on this topic, particularly the concern over how it will be financed. Our Federal Government, and perhaps, the State, would simply plow ahead and let our grandchildren continue to pay the growing bill. Links:
Subscribe to this site via RSS/Atom: Newsletter signup | Send us your ideas
Comments
Jim, I completely support the reduction or elimination of Teaching and Learning. This department is not in touch with the school or servicing the staff. My many complaints with Lisa and that department is endless. Great idea. Posted by: mary Battaglia at January 12, 2010 1:44 PMIf the proponents of 4K actually believed the hype that it will reduce the need for various remedial services in the future, they would propose cuts to those services to be phased in as appropriate. For example, the board would plan to phase in 25%-50% cuts in reading recovery and other similar programs. The truth is you can tell exactly how much of a benefit to education 4K is expected to be by the failure to propose reductions in such programs in out years as a means to finance 4K. Posted by: Donald Pay at January 12, 2010 3:33 PMWell it's kinda hard to advocate for an increase in TAG identification while simultaneously advocating for a decrease in training for those very skills that differentiate TAG kids from the rest of the bunch. Maybe 4K isn't the best way to go about this, but I haven't seen any better ideas...so far. Posted by: David Cohen at January 12, 2010 7:13 PMIwould like to fund the 4K by reducing the teacher coaching program (est. $3 million) this program has never been evaluated and many of its objectives may be met at drastically reduced costs. The highest salaried non-teaching-coaching teachers can be offered early retirement or classroom teaching assignments.I would also like us to meet our responsibility to educate the 50% junior and senior high students not college bound by offering them tuition at MATC not space in our High Schools. Posted by: william p. rowe at February 9, 2010 3:16 PMPost a comment
|