School Information System
Newsletter Sign Up |

Subscribe to this site via RSS: | Newsletter signup | Send us your ideas

October 3, 2008

A Broader Definition of Merit: The Trouble With College Entry Exams

Brent Staples:

Imagine yourself an admissions director of a status-seeking college that wants desperately to move up in the rankings. With next year's freshman class nearly filled, you are choosing between two applicants. The first has very high SAT scores, but little else to recommend him. The second is an aspiring doctor who tests poorly but graduated near the top of his high school class while volunteering as an emergency medical technician in his rural county.

This applicant has the kind of background that higher education has always claimed to covet. But the pressures that are driving colleges -- and the country as a whole -- to give college entry exams more weight than they were ever intended to have would clearly work against him. Those same pressures are distorting the admissions process, corrupting education generally and slanting the field toward students whose families can afford test preparation classes.

Consider the admissions director at our hypothetical college. He knows that college ranking systems take SAT's and ACT's into account. He knows that bond-rating companies look at the same scores when judging a college's credit worthiness. And in lean times like these, he would be especially eager for a share of the so-called merit scholarship money that state legislators give students who test well.

Posted by Jim Zellmer at October 3, 2008 3:11 AM
Subscribe to this site via RSS/Atom: Newsletter signup | Send us your ideas