Segregating the smart from the not-as-smart helps nobody

Chris Rickert

I’ve never been accused of having any talent worth nurturing in an Advanced Placement class, although I’m sure there are some who would say I have a gift for irritating people. (Unfortunately, they don’t give out Rhodes Scholarships for that.)
So feel free to take what I’m about to say with a grain of salt, or a healthy dose of sour grapes on my part, but I question the utility of the way we challenge the young brainiacs among us.
Diving deeply into physics or fine arts might make for good rocket scientists and concert pianists, but it would also seem inevitably to exclude a certain less intense, yet broader range of experiences and the people they include.
My new Facebook friends and perhaps the most courteous political insurgents ever, Madison West seniors Joaquin Selva and Jacob Fiksel, admitted to something along those lines when I ran into them Wednesday at the school district’s Community Conversation on Education.

Lots of related links:

One thought on “Segregating the smart from the not-as-smart helps nobody”

  1. I realize this is an opinion column, but this article is irresponsible as a piece of journalism as it is not based on factual information. Çhris Rickert ignorantly espouses many of the common myths people hold about gifted education. Please see the following link from the National Association for Gifted Children (NAGC) regarding “myths” – based on research. The NAGC is a recognized institution in education, and the practices it espouses are based on research.
    http://www.nagc.org/commonmyths.aspx
    Chris Rickert’s loose cannon journalism in this piece is appalling.

Comments are closed.