The Real Issue Behind the Rhee Flap: Why Can’t Schools Fire Bad Teachers?

Patrice Wingert:

Michelle Rhee, the tough-talking D.C. schools chancellor, is used to taking her lumps from the press, the teachers’ unions, and city politicians as she tries to overhaul one of the nation’s worst public-school systems. But this week she’s been under siege after a controversial quote about teachers molesting students made it into print. Rhee is fighting back, but the whole episode highlights a bigger problem in districts all over the country: why can’t a school system fire teachers who abuse kids or don’t bother showing up for work? In D.C., as in many other cities with “progressive” employee discipline procedures, school officials can suspend such teachers but can’t terminate them.
The latest uproar began with the publication of a short “update” item in the Feb. 1 issue of Fast Company, in which Rhee seemed to say that the 266 teachers laid off last fall during the system’s budget crunch had histories of abusing students, corporal punishment, and chronic absenteeism: “I got rid of teachers who had hit children, who had had sex with children, who had missed 78 days of school. Why wouldn’t we take those things into consideration?” Rhee is quoted as saying.