The experiment — an attempt to downsize the American high school — has proven less successful than hoped.
The changes were often so divisive — and the academic results so mixed — that the Gates Foundation has stopped always pushing small as a first step in improving big high schools. Instead, it’s now also working directly on instruction, giving grants to improve math and science instruction, for example.
Most of the dozen-and-a-half Washington schools with so-called “conversion” grants have ended up only as hybrids — a mix of small-school elements added to big-school features.
Going forward, the foundation is advocating a core curriculum that all high-school students would be expected to take, he said. And it wants to help improve math and science instruction by backing efforts to increase math requirements for high-school students, and to train more math and science teachers and pay them better.
One thought on “Gates Foundation’s Small Learning Communities Have Yet to Yield Big Results”
Comments are closed.
I was wondering if the study also examined smaller highschools being safer schools which would lend itself to a renewed focus on academics? I am very much an advocate of smaller schools but it has to be structured in a way to maximize academics and security concerns. thanks for asking.